Linux-Kernel Archive: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree From: Keller, Jacob E Date: Fri Sep 07 2018 - 18:03:20 EST Next message: Jeff Mahoney: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] kbuild: support syncing .config non-interactively and record ARCH in spec file" Previous message: Paul Burton: "Re: [PATCH] mips: bug: add unlikely() to BUG_ON()" In reply to: David Miller: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 10:31 AM > To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kirsher, Jeffrey T ; > Bowers, AndrewX > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree > > From: "Keller, Jacob E" > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:30:42 +0000 > > > There's some discussion about this going on in the intel-wired-lan > > mailing list. > > I really want to see a pull request in my inbox fixing this by the end > of today or I'll apply a fix directly at my discretion. Jeff is out, so I just opted to email a fix to netdev. I hope this is acceptable. I opted to essentially revert the patch that moved code to i40e_ethtool_stats.h, rather than anything fancier, since it was fast, and correct. There was a suggestion to only move the one offending function, but I felt that it was better to move everything back into the .c files. Thanks, Jake Next message: Jeff Mahoney: "Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] kbuild: support syncing .config non-interactively and record ARCH in spec file" Previous message: Paul Burton: "Re: [PATCH] mips: bug: add unlikely() to BUG_ON()" In reply to: David Miller: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree" Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
