Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect Stephen Rothwell (Stephen.Rothwell@canb.auug.org.au) Fri, 7 May 1999 13:04:28 +1000 (EST) Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect" Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect" Maybe in reply to: Paul Vojta: "SIGIO on socket disconnect" Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect" $ uname -a Linux oak 2.0.35 #1 Wed Nov 25 17:40:56 EST 1998 i686 unknown $ ./sigtest SIGIO received $ uname -a Linux fw 2.0.36 #1 Mon Dec 7 12:06:48 EST 1998 i686 unknown $ ./sigtest SIGIO received $ uname -a Linux fw 2.0.37 #1 Tue Apr 20 16:46:43 EST 1999 i686 unknown [Actually 2.0.37pre10] $ ./sigtest SIGIO received $ uname -a Linux col100 2.2.1 #1 Fri Mar 5 14:19:27 EST 1999 i686 unknown $ ./sigtest No signal received. These are all basically unpatched kernels from source downloaded from kernel.org. Cheers, Stephen Rothwell - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect" Previous message: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect" Maybe in reply to: Paul Vojta: "SIGIO on socket disconnect" Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: SIGIO on socket disconnect"
