Java程序辅导

C C++ Java Python Processing编程在线培训 程序编写 软件开发 视频讲解

客服在线QQ:2653320439 微信:ittutor Email:itutor@qq.com
wx: cjtutor
QQ: 2653320439
Mellanox MT27500 ConnectX3 | Andrew Jameson Andrew Jameson Systems & Software Engineer Menu Skip to content About Links Major Projects CASPSR Molonglo Molonglo – Tiled Beams Technical Memos Mellanox MT27500 ConnectX3 NUMA with shared memory ROACH + Myricom 10G-PCIE-8A Search for: Mellanox MT27500 ConnectX3 Hardware The testing was performed between 2 SSTAR nodes (sstar158 & sstar159) from the Green2 Supercomputer. Each server was isolated from the rest of the supercomputer for the purposes of this benchmarking. The configuration of the hardware was: 2 x E5-2660 CPUs 64 GB RAM Mellanox MT27500 ConnectX 3 in PCIe 3.0 slot The ports on the Mellanox cards were connected to each other directly (no switch): Port 1: QSFP+ cable, X m Port 2: QSFP+ to 10GbE cable Results The purpose of this testing was to establish whether line rate 10GbE communications can ocurr on 1 port of the Mellanox card whilst the other port is receiving native Infiniband data at high data rates. The summary is that this card can indeed to this. Port 1 (FDR IB) Port 2 (10GbE) Test Rate [MB/s] Test Rate [MB/s] rdma_bw -n 5000 5947 MB/s (47.6 Gb/s) ibv_send_bw -n 50000 6041 MB/s (48.3 Gb/s) netperf TCP_STREAM, 1500 MTU 1174 MB/s (9.395 Gb/s) netperf UDP_STREAM, 9000 MTU 1240 MB/s (9.926 Gb/s) netperf TCP_STREAM, 9000 MTU 1238 MB/s (9.907 Gb/s) ib_send_bw -n 50000 6040 MB/s (48.3 Gb/s) netperf TCP_STREAM, 9000 MTU 1238 MB/s (9.908 Gb/s) TEST 1: Port 1, ib_send_bw test The first testing performed was with the ib_send_bw application from the OFED perftest package. The best average bandwidth was 6000.52 MB/s which equates to 48 Gb/s (of maximum possible 56 Gb/s). [ajameson-test@sstar158 src]$ ib_send_bw -i 1 -a sstar159 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Send BW Test Number of qps : 1 Connection type : RC TX depth : 300 CQ Moderation : 50 Mtu : 4096B Link type : IB Max inline data : 0B rdma_cm QPs : OFF Data ex. method : Ethernet ------------------------------------------------------------------ local address: LID 0xb9 QPN 0x00b8 PSN 000000 remote address: LID 0xba QPN 0x00b4 PSN 000000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ #bytes #iterations BW peak[MB/sec] BW average[MB/sec] 2 1000 8.41 7.83 4 1000 16.69 15.00 8 1000 33.57 30.84 16 1000 67.15 60.29 32 1000 134.02 122.76 64 1000 269.12 242.15 128 1000 533.97 482.53 256 1000 1065.81 982.46 512 1000 2127.41 1908.28 1024 1000 3605.17 3424.30 2048 1000 4490.45 4383.69 4096 1000 5076.62 5038.27 8192 1000 5390.23 5388.25 16384 1000 5805.28 5796.05 32768 1000 5899.93 5899.49 65536 1000 5950.22 5950.13 131072 1000 5992.22 5992.10 262144 1000 5991.90 5991.90 524288 1000 6000.85 6000.52 1048576 1000 5996.65 5996.65 2097152 1000 5988.60 5988.60 TEST 2: Port 1, ib_send_bw test The first testing performed was with the ib_send_bw application from the OFED perftest package. The best average bandwidth was 6000.52 MB/s which equates to 48 Gb/s (of maximum possible 56 Gb/s). Since the FDR connection utilizes a [ajameson-test@sstar158 src]$ ib_send_bw -i 1 -a sstar159 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Send BW Test Number of qps : 1 Connection type : RC TX depth : 300 CQ Moderation : 50 Mtu : 4096B Link type : IB Max inline data : 0B rdma_cm QPs : OFF Data ex. method : Ethernet ------------------------------------------------------------------ local address: LID 0xb9 QPN 0x00b8 PSN 000000 remote address: LID 0xba QPN 0x00b4 PSN 000000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ #bytes #iterations BW peak[MB/sec] BW average[MB/sec] 2 1000 8.41 7.83 4 1000 16.69 15.00 8 1000 33.57 30.84 16 1000 67.15 60.29 32 1000 134.02 122.76 64 1000 269.12 242.15 128 1000 533.97 482.53 256 1000 1065.81 982.46 512 1000 2127.41 1908.28 1024 1000 3605.17 3424.30 2048 1000 4490.45 4383.69 4096 1000 5076.62 5038.27 8192 1000 5390.23 5388.25 16384 1000 5805.28 5796.05 32768 1000 5899.93 5899.49 65536 1000 5950.22 5950.13 131072 1000 5992.22 5992.10 262144 1000 5991.90 5991.90 524288 1000 6000.85 6000.52 1048576 1000 5996.65 5996.65 2097152 1000 5988.60 5988.60 4194304 1000 5670.85 5661.53 8388608 1000 5646.17 5643.64 ------------------------------------------------------------------ TEST 3: Port 2, ib_send_bw test The second test was the same ib_send_bw test, but this time using port 2 (10GbE), here the maximum data rate achieved was only 1089 MB/s (8.4 Gb/s) [ajameson-test@sstar158 src]$ ib_send_bw -i 2 -a sstar159 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Send BW Test Number of qps : 1 Connection type : RC TX depth : 300 CQ Moderation : 50 Mtu : 1024B Link type : Ethernet Gid index : 0 Max inline data : 0B rdma_cm QPs : ON Data ex. method : rdma_cm ------------------------------------------------------------------ local address: LID 0000 QPN 0x00b5 PSN 000000 GID: 254:128:00:00:00:00:00:00:02:02:201:255:254:34:07:66 remote address: LID 0000 QPN 0x00b1 PSN 000000 GID: 254:128:00:00:00:00:00:00:02:02:201:255:254:33:253:18 ------------------------------------------------------------------ #bytes #iterations BW peak[MB/sec] BW average[MB/sec] 2 1000 11.72 11.25 4 1000 22.75 22.26 8 1000 45.49 44.50 16 1000 90.98 89.10 32 1000 181.97 178.10 64 1000 362.95 355.76 128 1000 639.49 638.64 256 1000 817.61 817.44 512 1000 979.34 979.19 1024 1000 1077.57 1077.11 2048 1000 1083.00 1081.56 4096 1000 1085.19 1085.12 8192 1000 1088.08 1087.93 16384 1000 1088.97 1088.91 32768 1000 1089.39 1089.37 65536 1000 1089.66 1089.66 131072 1000 1089.88 1089.86 262144 1000 1089.93 1089.92 524288 1000 1089.94 1089.94 1048576 1000 1089.97 1089.96 2097152 1000 1089.97 1089.97 4194304 1000 1089.98 1089.98 8388608 1000 1089.98 1089.98 ------------------------------------------------------------------ TEST 4: Port 2, netperf TCP_STREAM Here, netperf was used to with the default TCP_STREAM test on port 2. 9.4 Gb/s which is not bad, MTU = 1500. [ajameson-test@sstar158 src]$ ~/linux_64/bin/netperf -H 10.1.1.2 MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.1.1.2 (10.1.1.2) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 65536 65536 10.00 9395.10 Importantly I also re-ran this transfer test whilst a bulk transfer was ocurring on port 1 (at 5.5 GB/s) and the results did not change. This was particularly encouraging – implying the comments Dan made regarding IB / GbE conflicts were perhaps not valid for this card ? TEST 5: Port 2, netperf TCP_STREAM with MTU 9000 Same as test above, but this time using a 9000 byte MTU on the 10GbE interface. This time around we pretty much reached the line rate [ajameson-test@sstar158 src]$ ~/linux_64/bin/netperf -H 10.1.1.2 MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 10.1.1.2 (10.1.1.2) port 0 AF_INET Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 87380 65536 65536 10.00 9907.52 Other Log in Entries feed Comments feed WordPress.org Search for: Proudly powered by WordPress