1Fingerprint Identification By: Travis R. Gault Overview Introduction Features of interest Feature Encoding Implementations in Industry Conclusions Lab Overview Steps for Classroom Implementation References Introduction Fingerprints have been used for centuries for identification purposes Much like irises, each fingerprint is unique to individuals Even identical twins have different fingerprints 2Introduction There are three fundamental principles of fingerprints [3]. 1. A fingerprint is an individual characteristic and no two fingers have identical ridge characteristics 2. A fingerprint will remain unchanged during an individual’s lifetime. 3. Fingerprints have general ridge patterns, making it possible to systematically classify them. Features of Interest Global Features - are the characteristics that any human can see with the naked eye Basic Ridge Patterns Pattern Area Delta Type Lines Ridge Count Local Features - or “Minutia Points” are the unique characteristics of fingerprint ridges that are used for positive identification. It’s possible to have the same global features, but the local features remain unique. Features of Interest Pattern Area - is the part of the fingerprint that contains all the global features. However, some local features may be found outside the pattern area. Images taken from [1]. 3Features of Interest Core Point - is the approximate center of the fingerprint, and is used as the reference point for reading/classifying the print. More specifically it is defined as the topmost point on the innermost upwardly curving ridgeline The figure below, taken from [2], shows some fingerprints and their core point locations Features of Interest Type Lines - are the two innermost ridges that start parallel, diverge, and tend to surround the pattern area. Type Lines Features of Interest Delta - is the point on the first bifurcation, abrupt ending ridge, meeting of two ridges, dot, fragmentary ridge, or any point on a ridge at or nearest the center of divergence of two type lines, located at or directly in front of their point of divergence. 4Features of Interest Ridge Count - is the number of ridges between the delta and the core. This is done by drawing an imaginary line from the Delta to the Core and each ridge that touches this line is counted. Features of Interest In the figure below, taken from [4], the circle is the core, the triangle is the delta, the square is a minutiae-ridge ending and the diamond is a minutiae-ridge bifurcation. The orange line is the ridge count line. Features of Interest Local Features Ridge Ending - ridge ends Ridge Bifurcation - divides into branches Ridge Divergence - diverging of two parallel lines Dot or Island - small ridge Enclosure - divides and reunites Short Ridge - like a dot/island, but larger Image taken from [5]. 5Features of Interest Basic Ridge Patterns Loop - is the most common (~65% of all prints) Arch - more open curve than a loop Whorl - ridge that makes a complete circle (~30% of all prints) Feature Encoding Manual Human experts use a combination of visual, textural, minutiae cues and experience for verification Still used in the final stages of law enforcement applications Image based Utilizes only visual appearance. Requires the complete image to be stored (large template sizes) Taken from [5]. Feature Encoding Texture based Treats the fingerprint as an oriented texture image Less accurate than minutiae based matchers since most regions in the fingerprints carry low textural content Minutiae based Uses the relative position of the minutiae points The most popular and accurate approach for verification Resembles manual approach very closely. From a software perspective, the minutia are also used to align the images for database comparisons. 6Feature Encoding Image Based Matching Using Optical Correlation Advantages Image itself is used as the template Requires only low resolution images Fast Disadvantages Image itself is used as the template Requires accurate alignment of the two prints Not robust to changes in scale, orientation and position Taken from [5] Feature Encoding Texture Based Matching Advantages Uses texture information (lost in optical and minutiae based schemes) Performs well with poor quality prints Features are statistically independent from minutiae and can be combined with minutiae matchers for higher accuracy Disadvantages Requires accurate alignment of the two prints Varies with translation, orientation and non- linear distortion Less accurate than minutiae based matchers Taken from [5] Feature Encoding Minutiae Based Matching Advantages Invariant to translation, rotation and scale changes Very accurate Disadvantages Error prone in low quality images Not robust to non-linear distortion Does not use visual and textural cues Taken from [5]. 7Feature Encoding In simple terms, we’re looking for areas where ridges stop or intersect another ridge. This data is stored and used for comparisons to other templates Image taken from [5]. Implementations Binarization Approach Used by: MINDTCT fingerprint minutiae detection system NIST uses this in a lot of implementations NBIS - NIST Biometric Image Software Done directionally or with template matching to detect minutiae Adaptive Flow Orientation Technique Binarization is done by peak detection But this leads to false positive in areas of poor contrast Direct Gray Scale Ridge Following Based on ridge pursuit Has low computational complexity Cannot handle poor contrast prints and images with poor ridge structure Relies on a good orientation map for ridge pursuit Modified from [5]. Implementations Images taken from [5]. Binarization Thinning Minutia DetectionAcquisition 8Implementations The biometrics lab setup uses the Binarization approach. Additionally, a variety of software is freely available on the web for C++, C#, Java, and VB implementations. Implementations How successful is Fingerprint Matching? Typical False Rejection Rates range between 0.03%-1.4% [1,6] Typical False Acceptance Rates are around 0.01%-0.001% [1,6]. These rates depend on the manufacturer and the algorithm used Comparatively, iris FRR is about 0.001% and FAR is about 1 in billions (basically 0). Conclusions Fingerprinting is still a viable means for biometric identification, especially in law enforcement, where fingerprints may be left behind. Fingerprints also offer a cheaper solution for day-to- day activities than iris recognition Fingerprints are not as good for high-security implementation More work needs to be done to develop better methods to compensate for the variations in fingerprint recording when identifying local features 9Lab Overview Each classmate will submit their right thumbprint twice One set of thumbprints will serve as a gallery One set of thumbprints will serve as a test gallery, along with two additional random prints Students will use MATLAB and code examples provided to encode fingerprint minutiae Students will test each print from the test gallery and shall report on the FAR and FRR. Students must also include technical documentation as well as a small research segment into the field of fingerprint analysis. Lab Overview This lab will be officially distributed on Tues., Nov. 12, and will be due no later than Noon in the CVIP Lab on Dec. 8. Students must submit all code and supporting files with the report. Students must arrange to demo their work. Steps for Implemetation 6 Steps: Preprocessing Binarization Thinning Minutiae identification Minutiae alignment Database comparisons 10 Preprocessing Unless you have a very high quality fingerprint reader, you’ll need to enhance the image after cropping There are two goals: Increase the contrast in the image Bridge empty spots in ridges Techniques Histogram equalization (histeq) Gamma correction Gabor Filter (gaborfilter) Download from: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/5237 Histogram Equalization The histogram equalization technique is used to improve global image contrast. However, the disadvantage is that it may have the incorrect effect by increasing background noise while decreasing the signal of interest. The implementation of this will depend on the images rendered by your input device. Gabor Filter “The Gabor filter is basically a Gaussian (with variances Sx and Sy along x and y-axes respectively) modulated by a complex sinusoid (with center frequencies U and V along x and y-axes respectively).” [9] This will help bridge the empty spots along ridges. 11 Binarization Next, convert the 8-bit grayscale images to 1-bit images Select a window block size (say 32x32) Find the average of the values in the block Set values greater than the average equal 1, else 0 Thinning Next, we must convert the binary image to a set of lines. This process is called thinning. MATLAB’s morphological toolbox facilitates this bwmorph( bin_img, ‘thin’, ‘inf’) Minutiae Detection We are primarily interested in two types of minutia Termination Points – where a ridge ends Bifurcation Points – where a ridge splits Now, consider a 3x3 window in the thinned image (see right). We are interested in figures that look like the top row or rotated versions. We are not interested in images like the bottom row 101 010 010 Bifurcation 000 010 010 Termination 001 001 010 Not Interested 001 000 101 Not Interested 12 Minutiae Detection How do you tell the difference between valid and invalid windows? Windows with the center value set equal to 0 are of no interest to us. 001 001 010 Not Interested 001 000 101 Not Interested Minutiae Detection How do you distinguish between bifurcation and termination points? Sum the entries and subtract 1. If the answer is 3, then it’s a bifurcation point, If the answer is 1, then it’s a termination point 101 010 010 Bifurcation 000 010 010 Termination 001 010 010 Not Interested 000 010 000 Not Interested Minutiae Detection This is an example of detecting the termination points from a thinned image taken with the lab’s finger print reader. Done using MATLAB 13 Minutiae Detection This is an example of detecting the bifurcation points from a thinned image taken with the lab’s finger print reader. Done using MATLAB Minutiae Detection This is a composite of both the bifurcation and termination points along with the original thinned image. Minutiae Detection After identifying the minutiae as on the previous slides, there are a lot of spurious minutiae that need to be removed This can be done removing minutiae that occur with an arbitrary Euclidian distance from one another. We need to check the following points’ distances: Termination-Termination Termination-Bifurcation (and vice versa) Bifurcation-Bifurcation Coordinates separated by a smaller distance than specified shall be removed 14 Minutiae Detection Next Time On Tuesday: ROI selection Minutiae Orientation/Alignment Gallery comparison Fingerprint project distributed Fingerprint acquisition (CVIP Lab) ROI Selection The ROI selection is determined using MATLAB’s morpho- logical toolbox by running the thinned image is through imclose(), imerode() and imfill(). The results are shown below. 15 ROI Selection The next step is to mask out coordinates outside the ROI. Graphically, the results are shown below. Termination Orientation Consider a 5x5 square centered about a termination point. We know the angle of each border point w.r.t. the center point. When the termination point intersects the border, we then know a rough estimate of the angle. -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 Termination Orientation Example Let the red blocks represent a termination ridge From this, we determine the angle to be 120 degrees -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 16 Termination Orientation Example Let the red blocks represent a termination ridge From this, we have two possible angles: 120 or 135 degrees. We must choose which to use. In my code, I use the angle representing the smallest distance from the center. In this case 135. -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 Termination Orientation Example Let the red blocks represent a termination ridge From this, we have no possible angles, which indicates noise. In this case, we remove the point from the list of termination minutia. -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 Bifurcation Orientation Example Let the red blocks represent a bifurcation ridge and an unknown ridge. We must determine all three angles, and exclude the angles from the unknown ridge. To do this, apply bwlabel(). One region will be labeled with 1’s, the other with 2’s. Select the correct region that by choosing the label assigned to X -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 17 Bifurcation Orientation Example Remove X and apply bwlabel() again. In the second figure, red = 1, green = 2, blue = 3 Perform a similar operation to determine the three angles by analyzing each label (1,2,3). Handle multiple angles for each label as with termination points or similarly -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 -135 -150 180 150 135 -45-60-90-120 -30 0X 30 456090120 Orientation Results The results of finding the termination and bifurcation points is on the right. Gallery Comparisons General Steps 1. Select any one minutia from image A and B. This will serve as the origin in each image. 2. Use the orientation and location information from the minutia in image A to transform all minutia in image B, about it’s origin. 3. Perform a similarity comparison between the minutia in A to the transformed minutia in B. There are a large variety of algorithms and types available You will investigate and select algorithm to use in the project 4. Repeat for all minutia in B. 5. Select a new image A to compare against B if the similarity score is insufficient. 18 Gallery Comparisons Graphically, this is what we are doing w.r.t. rotating the coordinates. Image taken from [8]. θ D E F D E F X-axis Y-axis X'-axis Y'-axis y x References 1. “DigitalPersonaTM White Paper: Guide to Fingerprint Identification.” Voice Recognition Systems. www.talktoyourcomputer.com 2. “Frequently Asked Questions.” SecuGen Biometrics Solutions. http://www.secugen.com/support/faqs.htm 3. “Fingerprint Techniques Manual.” New Mexico Department of Health, Division of Health Improvement. 4. Liu, L.; Dai, T.; Hsin-Chu. “Ridge Orientation Estimation and Verification Algorithm for Fingerprint Enhancement.” Journal of Universal Knowledge Management. Vol. 12, Issue 10. Pgs. 1426-1438. 5. Chikkerur, S. “Online Fingerprint Verification.” Center for Unified Biometrics and Sensors. University at Buffalo. 6. “Security Issues.” Affirmative Technologies. http://www.affirmativeusa.com/security_issues.htm 7. “FingerPrint Demo.” MathWorks. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fx_files/16728/1/content/FingerPri nt/html/fingerprint.html References 8. Zhili, W. “Fingerprint Recognition.” Department of Computer Science. BS Thesis. Hong Kong Baptist University. http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/~vincent/resPaper.htm 9. “2D Gabor Filter (Ver 1,2,3).” MathWorks. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/5237 10. Kenner, F. “FingerPrint Demo”. Mathworks. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fx_files/16728/1/content/FingerPri nt/html/fingerprint.html