Java程序辅导

C C++ Java Python Processing编程在线培训 程序编写 软件开发 视频讲解

客服在线QQ:2653320439 微信:ittutor Email:itutor@qq.com
wx: cjtutor
QQ: 2653320439
"Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and res" by Xiaohong Jia, Ming Zhang et al. Home Search Browse Communities My Account About Digital Commons Network™ Skip to main content My Account Contact Us FAQ Home < Previous Next >   Home > eis > papers > 6730 Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A   Title Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb-dynamic effects Authors Xiaohong Jia, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Ming Zhang, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Winson Lee, University of WollongongFollow RIS ID 114290 Publication Details Jia, X., Zhang, M. & Lee, W. C. C. (2004). Load transfer mechanics between trans-tibial prosthetic socket and residual limb-dynamic effects. Journal of Biomechanics, 37 (9), 1371-1377. Abstract The effects of inertial loads on the interface stresses between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket were investigated. The motion of the limb and prosthesis was monitored using a Vicon motion analysis system and the ground reaction force was measured by a force platform. Equivalent loads at the knee joint during walking were calculated in two cases with and without consideration of the material inertia. A 3D nonlinear finite element (FE) model based on the actual geometry of residual limb, internal bones and socket liner was developed to study the mechanical interaction between socket and residual limb during walking. To simulate the friction/slip boundary conditions between the skin and liner, automated surface-to-surface contact was used. The prediction results indicated that interface pressure and shear stress had the similar double-peaked waveform shape in stance phase. The average difference in interface stresses between the two cases with and without consideration of inertial forces was 8.4% in stance phase and 20.1% in swing phase. The maximum difference during stance phase is up to 19%. This suggests that it is preferable to consider the material inertia effect in a fully dynamic FE model. Download DOWNLOADS Since June 04, 2017 Included in Engineering Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons Share COinS   Link to publisher version (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.024     Search Enter search terms: Select context to search: in this series in this repository across all repositories Advanced Search Notify me via email or RSS Browse Communities Authors UOW Authors Author Corner FAQ Links University of Wollongong Library Digital Collections SelectedWorks Gallery   Digital Commons Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement Privacy Copyright